请英语好的人翻译几句话～
请英语好的人帮忙看看这几句话．都是有关于民族，种族和国家政策的．应该对英语高手很简单的，其实都是句子结构的问题．
this essay will go further and compare machines with the post-civil-rights regime that has effectively replaced them.
the capacity of the machine to organize and provide material inducements(often corruptly) operates as a means of solving, for the time being at least, conflicts of interest that might otherwise generate violence.
the machines also taught the less than ennobling lesson that votes could be sold to the highest bidder.
MALDEF(专有名词) felt so little pressure to moderate its de facto open-borders stance in response to the views of ordinary Mesican-Americans.
Bridges(人名) highlights how in reform citiees the "nonpartisan slating groups" intended to replace political parties as a way of endorsing candidates functionde like parties--except that as private organizations theirs deliberations were shielded from public scrutiny.
vulnerabilities can all without an exception flouris only undercertain common conditions and wither away in their absence.
inequalities are justified only when they work to the benefit of the worst off is too simplistic to accommodate these and other grounds on which they can be justified.
none of them can fight against his race-derived disadvantages without also fighting against those of the others of his race.
indeed, if te outcome is known to the policymakers, the policies, although race-neutral in intention, are not race-blind.
none of them can fight against his race-derived disadvantages without also fighting against those of the others of his race.
indeed, if te outcome is known to the policymakers, the policies, although race-neutral in intention, are not race-blind.
－－－－－－－－
请一定帮忙，跪谢
参考答案:这篇文章将进一步[阐述]并比较机器和取代了它们的后民事权利政权。
至少就目前而言，组织和提供物质诱惑（常常是腐败的）的机械生产力经营起来作为解决利益冲突的手段，可能反而会带来暴力行为。
机械也被教会了，当然还没有受到足够教训，选票可以卖给出价最高的人
当Maldfe回应普通墨西哥裔美国人关于开放边界的立场时并没有感到太大的压力
Bridges 强调了在改革公民中"非党派的国防组"是如何通过倾向于取代政党来支持候选人起政党的作用--除非他们作为私人组织审议免受公众监督.
受责难是必然的，繁荣只出现在某些共同的条件下并且随着消亡而消失。
不平等只有在它们为 那些太单纯以至无法接受这些以及那些不平等能够成立的理由 的最底层人的利益服务时才能成立。
他们中没有一个能避免在与 他的种族的衍生带来的弊端 做斗争的同时也打击他种族里的其他人。
的确，如果结果已经为决策者所知，那么那些政策，尽管倾向于种族中立，并不是种族盲。
下面的重复了。